A  judge in 
Menaugh's  estate sued both the mothers and their children for  negligence. One of the families tried to have their child dismissed  from the litigation, claiming she was too young to be sued – noting that her  bike still had training wheels. But Justice Paul Wooten of the State Supreme  Court in 
According to  The New York Times, the judge wrote there was no evidence that the 4-year-old  defendant lacked "intelligence of  maturity" and said that any "reasonably prudent child" would know  not to engage in risky behavior with or without a parent  present.
Do you have a  "reasonably prudent" 4-year-old? Do you think children should be held liable for  bike-riding accidents, or their parents --   or no one at all? Share your thoughts in the comments section below. (  moms.today.com )
 
No comments :
Post a Comment