A judge in
Menaugh's estate sued both the mothers and their children for negligence. One of the families tried to have their child dismissed from the litigation, claiming she was too young to be sued – noting that her bike still had training wheels. But Justice Paul Wooten of the State Supreme Court in
According to The New York Times, the judge wrote there was no evidence that the 4-year-old defendant lacked "intelligence of maturity" and said that any "reasonably prudent child" would know not to engage in risky behavior with or without a parent present.
Do you have a "reasonably prudent" 4-year-old? Do you think children should be held liable for bike-riding accidents, or their parents -- or no one at all? Share your thoughts in the comments section below. ( moms.today.com )
No comments :
Post a Comment